Many games work for a 4 year old PC. If you had a 4 year old gaming rig I am sure it is still better than the 360.
Actually the failure rate is more than 50%. Everyone I know with a 360 has had it RROD, that is 100% out of over 20 people.
Your higher standards are bullcrap because the 360 can't even output 7.1 sound nor HD sound due to the lack of HDMI 1.3. Before the PS3 came out most 360's didn't even have an hdmi output. Everyone knows digital video is better than analogue (component). Lets not forget that the 360 hasn't had a game surpass the PS3 visually since uncharted 1 came out. ...
Metal Gear will always be the king. Not once has a splinter cell game even come close to the epicness that is a kojima production.
Except ME2 removed most of the RPG elements. Now it is just a 3rd person shooter with dialogue choices.
The 360 hasn't been the graphics king since uncharted 1 came out. If any game for the 360 this year has a chance at challenging any game on the PS3 it is Alan Wake.
That was the only one I liked and it deserved the score it got. The other two just seemed more of the same except with online.
Mario has gone from 2d platformer to full 3d and then back to 2d.
Now compare Halo from one to 2 the only real difference was dual weilding and online. 2-3 a map editor and some new weapons.
Maybe the reason she (bungie) doesn't get banned is because she works for the site. Her job is to generate comments. Either that or she has some serious mental/life (or should I say no life) issues.
They are afraid. Look at them they are even hitting metacritic. 61 user average compared to critic average of 88, whereas MAG has a critic average of 76 and a user average of 83. Not since LBP have the fanboys come out in force 96 critic versus 64 user.
What can I say when you have nothing to play you have lots of time to troll.
How retarded is this guy? He is a xbox fanboy with the name gimped hardware. He's drawing attention to the main reason not to buy his console of choice. These guys get dumber by the minute.
So 47 sites give it a 90 or better, 59 give it an 80 or better, and 64 give it a 70 or better. 1 site gives a score 50 points less than the median of 90. Anyone that knows any statistics would throw that value out because it is an outlier. It takes the average from 89.3 to 88.6.
Have they fixed the lag yet?
Let's compare AAA's (over 90 score)
XBOX 360
Gears in 2008, Forza 3 in 2009 and ME2 in 2010. That's 3 in 3 years.
PS3
LBP, MGS4 in 2008 Uncharted 2, killzone 2, MLB 09 the show, GOW Collection in 2009. That's 6 in 2 years.
360 has no games.
I don't like how everyone just looks at MAG and sees 256 players and huge maps. The game has a lot more going for it than that. The command structure is something that is so well done and the strategy of the game makes it less of a mindless shooter than COD or Halo.
MW2 is just good for deathmatch and that is all anyone seems to play. It's just kill kill kill: no strategy. The only strategy is find a good place to camp.
Honestly, Killzone 2 is such a great game it is hard not to love it (easy if you haven't played it and are a fanboy). I have close to 140 hours of play on MAG and am loving every bit but Killzone 2 is undeniably the better game.
Is Bungie a Microsoft employee? For the amount of effort he puts into dissing the PS3 he could have got a paper route (assuming he is 12) or a real job and bought himself a PS3 by now.
Hey Bungie, you're famous. People are doing articles about how much of a pathetic loser you are. Get a life. Having multiple accounts was lame but a little funny in a way, but this is just sad. If you don't get a life at least get a PS3.
Really, did you expect anything less from Bungie? He is desperate.
I doubt halo reach will be as popular as halo 3.
Get a bluetooth dongle they're only about $20 and then you don't need to use the cable. That is, if the cable is a problem for you. I needed one because I have a bluetooth headset that I use for mic, I personally would rather use the mouse and keyboard.